Team report · all teams

KREMMELL

Power 46.4 · #25 of 33 on Anchor · Power Rankings

Compare with

All maps Anchor Glory Measure Miracles

Season 01 (this season)Preseason 01 Preseason 00

Losing the most points

1000m 6 gate madness 31% · 30th of 32 · 18 rounds
2200m 6 gate madness 29% · 24th of 31 · 14 rounds
2000m 6 gate madness 40% · 24th of 32 · 21 rounds

Winning the most points

1600m 6 gate madness 77% · 3rd of 32 · 17 rounds
1000m 1v1 59% · 10th of 33 · 27 rounds
1200m 12 gate WTA 71% · 8th of 30 · 7 rounds

Rounds won by segment

Win % · green above the 50% league average, red below · rank in the league

	1000m	1200m	1400m	1600m	1800m	2000m	2200m
1v1	59% 27r · 10th · 3.8/map	0% 3r · 2nd · 0.2/map	46% 20r · 21st · 2.7/map	—	49% 20r · 19th · 2.6/map	—	47% 25r · 18th · 3.2/map
6 gate madness	31% 18r · 30th · 2.5/map	45% 25r · 20th · 3.3/map	100% 1r · 0.1/map	77% 17r · 3rd · 2.2/map		40% 21r · 24th · 2.7/map	29% 14r · 24th · 1.9/map
12 gate WTA		71% 7r · 8th · 1.0/map			43% 7r · 18th · 1.0/map

Each cell: share of rounds won in that segment (rounds weighted by how often maps reach them), the number of rounds, and how often it comes up per map (Anchor). Grey = fewer than 3 rounds. Blank = that segment isn't on Anchor. Early in a season most cells have few rounds, so the boxes above only use segments with 6+ rounds and rank them with win rates steadied toward 50% — a lucky 4 from 4 won't top the list.

Roster fit · Anchor

The races that come up most on Anchor, most frequent first

Where each core ranks among every Pro League core in that race, from its league times (★ = best on the roster); underneath, its real record there this season. Green = higher in the league, red = lower, Middle = 40–60%. Read down a column to pick who runs it.

KREMMELL

Core	1000m1v1avg 50% · 3.8/map	1200m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 3.3/map	2200m1v1avg 50% · 3.2/map	1400m1v1avg 50% · 2.7/map	2000m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 2.7/map	1800m1v1avg 50% · 2.6/map	1000m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 2.5/map	1600m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 2.2/map	2200m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 1.9/map	1200m12 gate WTAavg 8.3% · 1.0/map
Tyrone Biggums	Bottom 23% won 16/27	Bottom 37% top 3 8/25					Bottom 22% top 3 7/18			Middle won 0/7
Mango Madness			Bottom 31% won 12/25		Middle top 3 12/21	★Top 18%			Middle top 3 7/14
Madness 2				★Top 7%	Bottom 22% top 3 6/21			Top 17% top 3 12/17	Bottom 17% top 3 2/14
Borat		Middle top 3 15/25		Top 12% won 9/20				Top 30%		Middle won 1/7
Mad Swine		Middle top 3 14/25					Bottom 35% top 3 9/18			Middle won 1/7
Tenebris						Middle won 9/20		★Top 8% top 3 8/17		Bottom 7% won 0/7
The Last Hairbender							★Top 34% top 3 8/18			Bottom 31% won 1/7
Biafra					Middle top 3 10/21
Bald Crusader									Middle top 3 7/14
Lucky Left Nut								Middle top 3 8/11		★Top 11% won 1/5
Ten Mangoes								Top 15% top 3 2/6
Medulla									Bottom 18%

Cores

Click a heat-map cell to see who ran that segment

Core	Races	Earns the point	Best segment	Needs work
Tyrone Biggums	77	0.9× avg	1000m 1v1 wins 59% (avg 50%) · 27	1200m 6 gate madness top 3 32% (avg 50%) · 25
Mango Madness	67	1.0× avg	2000m 6 gate madness top 3 57% (avg 50%) · 21	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 7
Madness 2	59	0.9× avg	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 43% (avg 8.3%) · 7	2200m 6 gate madness top 3 14% (avg 50%) · 14
Borat	53	1.1× avg	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 14% (avg 8.3%) · 7	1400m 1v1 wins 45% (avg 50%) · 20
Mad Swine	51	1.1× avg	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 14% (avg 8.3%) · 7	—
Tenebris	51	0.9× avg	1600m 6 gate madness top 3 47% (avg 50%) · 17	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 7
The Last Hairbender	29	0.8× avg	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 14% (avg 8.3%) · 7	1200m 1v1 wins 0.0% (avg 50%) · 3
Biafra	28	0.9× avg	2000m 6 gate madness top 3 48% (avg 50%) · 21	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 7
Bald Crusader	21	0.9× avg	2200m 6 gate madness top 3 50% (avg 50%) · 14	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 7
Lucky Left Nut	16	1.5× avg	1600m 6 gate madness top 3 73% (avg 50%) · 11	—
Ten Mangoes	8	0.9× avg	1600m 6 gate madness top 3 33% (avg 50%) · 6	—
Medulla	7	0.0× avg	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 7	—

Earns the point: how often a core does what wins its team the round — wins the race (1v1, WTA) or finishes top 3 (madness) — against an average entrant (1 in 2 for a 1v1, 1 in 22 for a 22-gate WTA). In big fields only an outright fast time wins, so steady cores that “beat most of the field” can still rarely score there. Best / needs-work segments need 3+ races.

Anchor, round by round

The fixed race order, how often maps get that far, and your win % in that round's segment on Anchor.

11000m 1v1100%59%

21000m 6 gate madness100%31%

31200m 12 gate WTA100%71%

41400m 1v1100%46%

51200m 6 gate madness100%45%

61800m 1v1100%49%

71600m 6 gate madness100%77%

81800m 12 gate WTA100%43%

92200m 1v1100%47%

102000m 6 gate madness100%40%

112200m 6 gate madness100%29%

121000m 1v1100%59%

131000m 6 gate madness100%31%

141400m 1v1100%46%

151200m 6 gate madness100%45%

161800m 1v1100%49%

171600m 6 gate madness100%77%

182200m 1v199%47%

191000m 1v199%59%

201200m 6 gate madness99%45%

212000m 6 gate madness96%40%

222200m 6 gate madness91%29%

232200m 1v185%47%

241000m 1v180%59%

251400m 1v175%46%

262000m 6 gate madness67%40%

271800m 1v159%49%

281000m 6 gate madness54%31%

292200m 1v138%47%

301200m 6 gate madness28%45%

311600m 6 gate madness20%77%

321200m 1v120%0%

332000m 6 gate madness9%40%

341400m 6 gate madness9%100%

A round is one race of a map; whoever wins it gets the point. Win % here is the share of rounds won in each segment this Preseason 00, with each round weighted by how often maps reach it (most maps end by round 27–30).