Team report · Lower league

North West

Power 58.3 · #2 of 40 on Anchor · Power Rankings

Compare with

All maps Anchor Glory Measure Miracles

Season 01 (this season)Preseason 01 Preseason 00

Losing the most points

1800m 1v1 40% · 34th of 40 · 29 rounds
1400m 1v1 43% · 28th of 40 · 31 rounds
2000m 6 gate madness 43% · 30th of 40 · 31 rounds

Winning the most points

1000m 1v1 70% · 3rd of 40 · 44 rounds
1200m 6 gate madness 63% · 5th of 40 · 37 rounds
2200m 1v1 62% · 5th of 40 · 38 rounds

Rounds won by segment

Win % · green above the 50% league average, red below · rank in the league

	1000m	1200m	1400m	1600m	1800m	2000m	2200m
1v1	70% 44r · 3rd · 3.9/map	—	43% 31r · 28th · 2.8/map	—	40% 29r · 34th · 2.6/map	—	62% 38r · 5th · 3.4/map
6 gate madness	54% 28r · 17th · 2.5/map	63% 37r · 5th · 3.3/map	—	67% 24r · 5th · 2.1/map		43% 31r · 30th · 2.8/map	54% 22r · 18th · 2.0/map
12 gate WTA		58% 12r · 14th · 1.0/map			67% 12r · 8th · 1.0/map

Each cell: share of rounds won in that segment (rounds weighted by how often maps reach them), the number of rounds, and how often it comes up per map (Anchor). Grey = fewer than 3 rounds. Blank = that segment isn't on Anchor. Early in a season most cells have few rounds, so the boxes above only use segments with 6+ rounds and rank them with win rates steadied toward 50% — a lucky 4 from 4 won't top the list.

Roster fit · Anchor

The races that come up most on Anchor, most frequent first

Where each core ranks among every Pro League core in that race, from its league times (★ = best on the roster); underneath, its real record there this season. Green = higher in the league, red = lower, Middle = 40–60%. Read down a column to pick who runs it.

North West

Core	1000m1v1avg 50% · 3.9/map	2200m1v1avg 50% · 3.4/map	1200m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 3.3/map	2000m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 2.8/map	1400m1v1avg 50% · 2.8/map	1800m1v1avg 50% · 2.6/map	1000m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 2.5/map	1600m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 2.1/map	2200m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 2.0/map	1200m12 gate WTAavg 8.3% · 1.0/map
Carrick				Bottom 33% top 3 15/31	★Top 36% won 13/31	Bottom 34% won 12/29		Top 29% top 3 12/24	Bottom 23%
Work from home	★Top 1% won 31/44		★Top 13% top 3 18/37				★Top 1% top 3 20/28			★Top 6% won 2/12
Couch Potato		Bottom 33% won 24/38		★Top 19% top 3 15/31					Middle top 3 9/22
Ibra			Top 28% top 3 23/37				Top 23% top 3 16/28			Top 11% won 1/12
J J Gabriel			Top 32% top 3 21/37				Top 27% top 3 11/28			Top 12% won 1/12
Ascend				Middle top 3 13/31				Middle	Bottom 29% top 3 12/22
Twat								★Top 9% top 3 15/24
Cecilia								Top 32% top 3 14/24	Bottom 25%
Nani					Middle					Top 18% won 2/12
Hoofey				Bottom 17%					Bottom 12% top 3 10/22
Radicalised WFH										Bottom 13% won 0/12
Arc Raider			Top 31%				Top 32%			Top 12% won 1/12

Cores

Click a heat-map cell to see who ran that segment

Core	Races	Earns the point	Best segment	Needs work
Carrick	127	0.9× avg	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 17% (avg 8.3%) · 12	1800m 1v1 wins 41% (avg 50%) · 29
Work from home	121	1.3× avg	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 17% (avg 8.3%) · 12	1200m 6 gate madness top 3 49% (avg 50%) · 37
Couch Potato	103	1.1× avg	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 17% (avg 8.3%) · 12	2200m 6 gate madness top 3 41% (avg 50%) · 22
Ibra	77	1.2× avg	1200m 6 gate madness top 3 62% (avg 50%) · 37	—
J J Gabriel	77	1.0× avg	1200m 6 gate madness top 3 57% (avg 50%) · 37	1000m 6 gate madness top 3 39% (avg 50%) · 28
Ascend	65	0.9× avg	2200m 6 gate madness top 3 55% (avg 50%) · 22	2000m 6 gate madness top 3 42% (avg 50%) · 31
Twat	36	1.2× avg	1600m 6 gate madness top 3 63% (avg 50%) · 24	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 12
Cecilia	36	1.2× avg	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 17% (avg 8.3%) · 12	—
Nani	24	1.5× avg	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 17% (avg 8.3%) · 12	—
Hoofey	22	0.9× avg	2200m 6 gate madness top 3 45% (avg 50%) · 22	—
Radicalised WFH	12	0.0× avg	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 12	—
Arc Raider	12	1.0× avg	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 8.3% (avg 8.3%) · 12	—

Earns the point: how often a core does what wins its team the round — wins the race (1v1, WTA) or finishes top 3 (madness) — against an average entrant (1 in 2 for a 1v1, 1 in 22 for a 22-gate WTA). In big fields only an outright fast time wins, so steady cores that “beat most of the field” can still rarely score there. Best / needs-work segments need 3+ races.

Anchor, round by round

The fixed race order, how often maps get that far, and your win % in that round's segment on Anchor.

11000m 1v1100%70%

21000m 6 gate madness100%54%

31200m 12 gate WTA100%58%

41400m 1v1100%43%

51200m 6 gate madness100%63%

61800m 1v1100%40%

71600m 6 gate madness100%67%

81800m 12 gate WTA100%67%

92200m 1v1100%62%

102000m 6 gate madness100%43%

112200m 6 gate madness100%54%

121000m 1v1100%70%

131000m 6 gate madness100%54%

141400m 1v1100%43%

151200m 6 gate madness100%63%

161800m 1v1100%40%

171600m 6 gate madness100%67%

182200m 1v1100%62%

191000m 1v1100%70%

201200m 6 gate madness99%63%

212000m 6 gate madness99%43%

222200m 6 gate madness97%54%

232200m 1v193%62%

241000m 1v187%70%

251400m 1v180%43%

262000m 6 gate madness74%43%

271800m 1v164%40%

281000m 6 gate madness51%54%

292200m 1v141%62%

301200m 6 gate madness25%63%

311600m 6 gate madness12%67%

321200m 1v112%—

332000m 6 gate madness7%43%

341400m 6 gate madness7%—

A round is one race of a map; whoever wins it gets the point. Win % here is the share of rounds won in each segment this Preseason 01, with each round weighted by how often maps reach it (most maps end by round 27–30).