Team report · all teams

North West

Power 53.5 · #12 of 33 on Anchor · Power Rankings

Compare with

All maps Anchor Glory Measure Miracles

Season 01 (this season)Preseason 01 Preseason 00

Losing the most points

2200m 6 gate madness 33% · 23rd of 31 · 12 rounds
2200m 1v1 45% · 19th of 32 · 22 rounds
1200m 6 gate madness 47% · 18th of 33 · 21 rounds

Winning the most points

1000m 1v1 63% · 4th of 33 · 24 rounds
1000m 6 gate madness 69% · 3rd of 32 · 17 rounds
1600m 6 gate madness 67% · 9th of 32 · 13 rounds

Rounds won by segment

Win % · green above the 50% league average, red below · rank in the league

	1000m	1200m	1400m	1600m	1800m	2000m	2200m
1v1	63% 24r · 4th · 3.8/map	100% 1r · 0.2/map	48% 18r · 18th · 2.7/map	—	49% 17r · 18th · 2.6/map	—	45% 22r · 19th · 3.2/map
6 gate madness	69% 17r · 3rd · 2.5/map	47% 21r · 18th · 3.3/map	—	67% 13r · 9th · 2.2/map		56% 18r · 14th · 2.7/map	33% 12r · 23rd · 1.9/map
12 gate WTA		50% 6r · 15th · 1.0/map			67% 6r · 9th · 1.0/map

Each cell: share of rounds won in that segment (rounds weighted by how often maps reach them), the number of rounds, and how often it comes up per map (Anchor). Grey = fewer than 3 rounds. Blank = that segment isn't on Anchor. Early in a season most cells have few rounds, so the boxes above only use segments with 6+ rounds and rank them with win rates steadied toward 50% — a lucky 4 from 4 won't top the list.

Roster fit · Anchor

The races that come up most on Anchor, most frequent first

Where each core ranks among every Pro League core in that race, from its league times (★ = best on the roster); underneath, its real record there this season. Green = higher in the league, red = lower, Middle = 40–60%. Read down a column to pick who runs it.

North West

Core	1000m1v1avg 50% · 3.8/map	1200m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 3.3/map	2200m1v1avg 50% · 3.2/map	1400m1v1avg 50% · 2.7/map	2000m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 2.7/map	1800m1v1avg 50% · 2.6/map	1000m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 2.5/map	1600m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 2.2/map	2200m6 gate madnessavg 50% · 1.9/map	1200m12 gate WTAavg 8.3% · 1.0/map
Carrick				★Top 36% won 9/18	Bottom 33% top 3 7/18	Bottom 34% won 9/17		Top 29% top 3 10/13	Bottom 23%
Work from home	★Top 1% won 15/24	★Top 13% top 3 11/21					★Top 1% top 3 9/17			★Top 6% won 0/6
Couch Potato			Bottom 33% won 10/22		★Top 19% top 3 13/18				Middle top 3 8/12
Ibra		Top 28% top 3 13/21					Top 23% top 3 9/17			Top 11% won 0/6
J J Gabriel		Top 32% top 3 8/21					Top 27% top 3 10/17			Top 12% won 0/6
Ascend					Middle top 3 8/18			Middle	Bottom 29% top 3 5/12
Twat								★Top 9% top 3 7/13
Cecilia								Top 32% top 3 5/13	Bottom 25%
Nani				Middle						Top 18% won 2/6
Hoofey					Bottom 17%				Bottom 12% top 3 3/12
Radicalised WFH										Bottom 13% won 0/6
Arc Raider		Top 31%					Top 32%			Top 12% won 1/6

Cores

Click a heat-map cell to see who ran that segment

Core	Races	Earns the point	Best segment	Needs work
Carrick	72	1.0× avg	1600m 6 gate madness top 3 77% (avg 50%) · 13	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 6
Work from home	69	1.1× avg	1000m 1v1 wins 63% (avg 50%) · 24	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 6
Couch Potato	58	1.2× avg	2000m 6 gate madness top 3 72% (avg 50%) · 18	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 6
Ibra	44	1.1× avg	1200m 6 gate madness top 3 62% (avg 50%) · 21	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 6
J J Gabriel	44	0.9× avg	1000m 6 gate madness top 3 59% (avg 50%) · 17	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 6
Ascend	36	0.8× avg	2000m 6 gate madness top 3 44% (avg 50%) · 18	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 6
Twat	19	1.0× avg	1600m 6 gate madness top 3 54% (avg 50%) · 13	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 6
Cecilia	19	1.1× avg	1800m 12 gate WTA wins 50% (avg 8.3%) · 6	1600m 6 gate madness top 3 38% (avg 50%) · 13
Nani	12	3.0× avg	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 33% (avg 8.3%) · 6	—
Hoofey	12	0.5× avg	2200m 6 gate madness top 3 25% (avg 50%) · 12	—
Radicalised WFH	6	0.0× avg	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 0.0% (avg 8.3%) · 6	—
Arc Raider	6	2.0× avg	1200m 12 gate WTA wins 17% (avg 8.3%) · 6	—

Earns the point: how often a core does what wins its team the round — wins the race (1v1, WTA) or finishes top 3 (madness) — against an average entrant (1 in 2 for a 1v1, 1 in 22 for a 22-gate WTA). In big fields only an outright fast time wins, so steady cores that “beat most of the field” can still rarely score there. Best / needs-work segments need 3+ races.

Anchor, round by round

The fixed race order, how often maps get that far, and your win % in that round's segment on Anchor.

11000m 1v1100%63%

21000m 6 gate madness100%69%

31200m 12 gate WTA100%50%

41400m 1v1100%48%

51200m 6 gate madness100%47%

61800m 1v1100%49%

71600m 6 gate madness100%67%

81800m 12 gate WTA100%67%

92200m 1v1100%45%

102000m 6 gate madness100%56%

112200m 6 gate madness100%33%

121000m 1v1100%63%

131000m 6 gate madness100%69%

141400m 1v1100%48%

151200m 6 gate madness100%47%

161800m 1v1100%49%

171600m 6 gate madness100%67%

182200m 1v199%45%

191000m 1v199%63%

201200m 6 gate madness99%47%

212000m 6 gate madness96%56%

222200m 6 gate madness91%33%

232200m 1v185%45%

241000m 1v180%63%

251400m 1v175%48%

262000m 6 gate madness67%56%

271800m 1v159%49%

281000m 6 gate madness54%69%

292200m 1v138%45%

301200m 6 gate madness28%47%

311600m 6 gate madness20%67%

321200m 1v120%100%

332000m 6 gate madness9%56%

341400m 6 gate madness9%—

A round is one race of a map; whoever wins it gets the point. Win % here is the share of rounds won in each segment this Preseason 00, with each round weighted by how often maps reach it (most maps end by round 27–30).